|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 364-370
New RP-HPLC method of miglitol in tablet dosage form including forced degradation studies and estimation in spiked rabbit plasma
NC Chittora, A Shrivastava, A Jain
Department of Pharma Analysis, B. R. Nahata College of Pharmacy, Mhow-Neemuch Road, Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh - 458 001, India
|Date of Web Publication||25-Jan-2010|
N C Chittora
Department of Pharma Analysis, B. R. Nahata College of Pharmacy, Mhow-Neemuch Road, Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh - 458 001
| Abstract|| |
A simple, accurate, precise, economic, and specific stability indicating the RP-HPLC method has been developed for the estimation of Miglitol in tablet dosage form and spiked rabbit plasma. Chromatographic separation was achieved using Lachrom HPLC with Lichrospher, ODS, (250õ 4.6) mm, ô 5 column at ambient temperature with 0.05 M ammonium acetate as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min and 216 nm was selected as a wave length for detection of a method. The retention time was 6.45 min. The standard curve was found to be linear (r 2 = 0.996) in the concentration range 800-1200 µg/ml using 1000 µg/ml as the test concentration. Apparent recovery was 98.338-101.704 % with RSD 0.942-0.964 for two brands. The method was repeatable with RSD 0.736. The intraday and interday precisions were RSD 0.957 and 1.019, respectively. LOD and LOQ of the method were 20 and 70 µg/ml, respectively. The presented study separates degradents and peaks appeared after spiking drug with plasma with a resolution of more than 1.5.
Keywords: Forced degradation, Miglitol, RP-HPLC, stability indicating
|How to cite this article:|
Chittora N C, Shrivastava A, Jain A. New RP-HPLC method of miglitol in tablet dosage form including forced degradation studies and estimation in spiked rabbit plasma. J Young Pharmacists 2009;1:364-70
|How to cite this URL:|
Chittora N C, Shrivastava A, Jain A. New RP-HPLC method of miglitol in tablet dosage form including forced degradation studies and estimation in spiked rabbit plasma. J Young Pharmacists [serial online] 2009 [cited 2014 Apr 24];1:364-70. Available from: http://www.jyoungpharm.in/text.asp?2009/1/4/364/59329
| Introduction|| |
Miglitol, (2R, 3R, 4R, 5S)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-(hydroxymethyl) piperidine-3, 4, 5-triol [Figure 1], an oral anti-diabetic drug acts by inhibiting the ability of the patient to breakdown complex carbohydrates into glucose and slows the digestion of sugars so our body has time to store extra sugar. 
The development of analytical method and validation followed by stability testing forms an important part of the process of drug product development. , The assay of drug product in stability test sample needs to be determined using a stability-indicating method, as recommended by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. ,,, The literature survey reveals that there are methods for the estimation of Miglitol in bulk and dosage forms including capillary electrophoresis,  tendom mass liquid chromatography, , and complexometric method,  but no RP-HPLC method was found with UV detection. The aim of this study is to develop a precise, accurate, economic, and simplest stability indicating the RP-HPLC method for the estimation of Miglitol (MGL) in tablet dosage forms and spiked plasma.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Apparatus and chemicals
The chromatographic system consists of an L-7110 solvent delivery system (Merk Hitachi), L-7400 double-beam UV detector (Merk Hitachi), L-7500 integrator, and a rheodyne injector valve bracket fitted with a 20 µl sample loop. Chromatographic separation was performed on a stainless steel Lichrocart ODS Column, (250×4.6 mm) packed with 5 µ particle diameter, Lichrocart HPLC guard cartridge system, and a winchrom software. All of the chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade. Solvents of HPLC grade purchased from Merck Ltd, Mumbai. Reference standard Miglitol was kindly gifted by Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Mumbai. Misobit and Mignar tablet of Lupin Pharma and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, respectively, were purchased from the local market.
The mobile phase consisting of a 0.05 M ammonium acetate solution prepared by 3.85 g ammonium acetate was accurately weighed and dissolved in 1000 ml water. The mobile phase was degassed and filtered by passing through a 0.45 µ millipore filter prior to use. The elution was carried out under isocratic condition at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min., with UV detection at 216 nm at ambient temperature. The chromatogram of finally optimized chromatographic condition has been shown in [Figure 2].
Preparation of standard solution and calibration curve
500 mg pure Miglitol was weighed and dissolved in water in 50 ml volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with water to get a 10 mg/ml solution. Suitable aliquots of standard stock solution of Miglitol were taken in the concentration range and diluted with the mobile phase to obtain working standard solutions of suitable concentrations. Triplicate 20 µl injections were made for each concentration and are chromatographed under the above-mentioned conditions. The average peak area of the three replicates was plotted against the corresponding concentration to obtain the calibration curve [Figure 3], regression equation was found to be (y =21185x +3E+06) with a 0.9996 correlation coefficient.
Validation of the proposed method
The developed method was validated for specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, LOD, LOQ, and system suitability testing.
Various generally used excipients such as lactose, talc, starch, and magnesium stearate were mixed in proportion approximately 90 mg, 28 mg, 30 mg, and 2 mg, respectively. They were mixed in 10 ml water in a volumetric flask, diluted up to the mark and filtered. 2 ml of this filtrate was diluted to 10 ml with mobile phase. 2 ml of the filtrate was mixed with a 2 ml standard stock solution in 10 ml volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark to produce 1000 µg/ml. One dilution of a 1000 µg/ml standard solution was also prepared. All the solutions were injected in the order of excipients mixture, 1000 µg/ml standard solution, and then excipients-drug mixture.
Overlay of excipients, pure drug, and excipients [Figure 4] with drug shows no peak of the excipients at the RT of the drug. Excipient peak shows a resolution of 2.5 with the drug peak, hence the method is specific.
Linearity is accessed by visualizing the graph of the calibration curve. The points in the calibration curve distributed equally above and below the trend line show linearity.
Linearity range: It is the interval in which the response is directly proportional to the concentration between the upper and lower levels (which is generally ± 5% of the intercept having slope equal to zero) and was 800-1200 µg/ml, respectively.
Working range: It begins from limit of quantification to the maximum concentration used for the development of the analytical method and in this case it is 70-1200.
Repeatability: Repeatability was accessed by six replicate injections of 1000 µg/ml solution of drug. % RSD found was found to be 0.736 showing that the method is repeatable.
Intraday and intraday precision: 0.8 ml, 1 ml, and 1.2 ml was taken out from the standard stock solution and diluted to 10 ml to make 800 µg/ml, 1000 µg/ml, and 1200 µg/ml, respectively. Three replicates of each dilution were injected three times a day for intraday and three replicates for 3 days for interday. % RSD found to be in this case were 0.957 and 1.019, respectively.
Recovery studies were performed with two brands Misobit (Lupin Ltd) and Mignar (Glenmark pharmaceuticals Ltd).
Powdered Misobit tablets (Lupin Ltd.) equivalent to 100 mg MGL was transferred to a 10 ml volumetric flask and ultrasonication was done for 20 min with approximately 5 ml water. Solution was then diluted up to the mark with water and filtered through 0.45 µ filter. 0.8 ml of this solution was spiked in three different 10 ml volumetric flasks with 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 ml of previously analyzed standard stock solution. Finally, volume was made up to the mark with mobile phase and estimation of drug content was done by proposed method.
Same procedure was followed for Mignar tablets except ultrasonication time was kept for 15 min. The results of recovery studies are shown in [Table 1] and [Table 2] for Misobit and Mignar, respectively.
Limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD)
Various dilutions of standard solution like 1200, 1000, 800, 600, 400, 200, 100, 50, 20, 15, and 10 µg/ml were prepared from the standard solution by taking (1.2, 1, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, 0.02, 0.015, and 0.01 ml) in a 10 ml volumetric flask and diluting up to the mark with mobile phase. Six replicates of each dilution were injected and curve between RSD and concentration was plotted [Figure 5]. The concentration where RSD exceeds the acceptable value and not receiving any response was considered as LOQ (70 µg/ml) and LOD (20 µg/ml), respectively.
System suitability testing
For system suitability testing six replicates of 1000 µg/ml were injected and result obtained given in [Table 3].
Estimation of MGL in tablet dosage form
Optimization of extraction time
Four dilutions of 1000 µg/ml of the formulation were prepared in the mobile phase and sonicated for 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min and 20 µl was injected immediately.
Procedure for estimation of MGL in tablet dosage form
Powdered Misobit tablet equivalent to 50 mg of MGL was taken in 50 ml volumetric flask and ultrasonication was done using approximately 25 ml water and diluted up to the mark with mobile phase. The content of drug in tablet was found by using equation. The same procedure was followed for Mignar tablets except ultrasonication time used is 20 min. The results of estimation of purity of Misobit and Mignar are given [Table 4].
Forced degradation studies
5 ml of standard stock solution was transferred in 50 ml volumetric flask and 1 ml concentrated HCl was added to it and kept for 2 h at ambient temperature then diluted to 25 ml with water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 6.5 with 1 M NaOH. The solution was finally diluted to 50 ml with mobile phase, and 20 µl volume was injected. The same procedure was repeated at 50 and 100 ºC, but no were degradents observed.
5 ml of the standard stock solution was transferred in a 50 ml volumetric flask and 1 ml 10 M NaOH was added to it and kept for 2 h then diluted to 25 ml with water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 6.5 with 1 N HCl. The solution was finally diluted to 50 ml with mobile phase and 20 µl volume was injected. The same procedure was repeated at 50 and 100 o C, but no degradents were observed.
5 ml of the standard stock solution was transferred in a 50 ml volumetric flask.1 ml 30% H 2 O 2 was added to it and kept for 2 h. It was diluted till 25 ml with water. The solution was finally diluted to 50 ml with mobile phase and 20 µl volume was injected. The same procedure was repeated at 50 o C and 100 o C, but no degradents were observed in the chromatogram.
Degradation by UV light
5 ml of the standard stock solution was transferred in a 50 ml volumetric flask in UV chamber for 24 h then diluted up to the mark with mobile phase to produce 1000 µg/ml and 20 µl was injected but again no degradents were observed.
Wet heat: 5 ml of the standard stock solution was transferred to two different 50 ml volumetric flasks and kept on water bath for 3 and 6 h, respectively, at 80 o C. It was diluted up to the mark with mobile phase to produce 1000 µg/ml and 20 µl was injected. [Figure 6] represents the chromatogram obtained due to wet heat.
Dry heat: 50 mg accurately weighed drug was taken in china dish and kept it in oven for 48 h at 100 o C. The drug was transferred to a 50 ml volumetric flask and diluted approximately 25 ml with water then volume was made up to the mark with mobile phase to produce1000 µg/ml and 20 µl volume was injected. [Figure 7] represents the chromatogram obtained due to dry heat.
The overall summary of degradation studies is presented in [Table 5].
Estimation of miglitol in spiked plasma
Preparation of sample
Approximately 1.5 ml blood was taken by cutting the marginal ear vein of rabbit and collected in eppendrof tubes with previously added EDTA. This was stored at −20 o C and centrifuged for 2 min at 8000 rpm for 10 min to separate plasma and again stored at 20 o C. 0.2 ml plasma was spiked with 0.1 ml of the standard stock solution and 0.6 ml mobile phase was added. Finally, the components were mixed thoroughly using cyclo mixture and then centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 rpm. The chromatogram obtained after injecting prepared sample is shown in [Figure 8].
Recovery study of miglitol in spiked plasma
0.1 ml of 8000 µg/ml drug solution prepared by a standard stock solution and spiked with 0.2 ml plasma and volume was made 1 ml with mobile phase and analyzed. 0.1 ml of this solution was spiked with 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 ml of 1000 µg/ml previously analyzed drug solution in three separate eppendrof tubes, and volume was made up to 1 ml with mobile phase. The results are shown in [Table 6].
| Conclusion|| |
In the present work, a HPLC method for the estimation of Miglitol in tablet dosage form has been developed. The proposed method is simple, precise, and accurate and do not suffer from any interferences due to common excipients. The degradation studies and results obtained after spiking drug in rabbit plasma showed separation of drug peak and other peaks with a resolution of more than 1.5. The newly developed method can be used in pharmaceutical industry for routine analysis of Miglitol in tablet dosage form. The summary of validation parameters is given in [Table 7]. The presented study can be further proceeded for the development of the bioanalytical method for the estimation of Miglitol in biological fluids.
| References|| |
|1.||Tripathi KD. Essentials of medical pharmacology. 6 th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee brother′s medical Publishers; 2008. p. 266, 270. |
|2.||Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch J L. Practical HPLC Method Development. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication; 2 nd ed. p. 697, 709. |
|3.||Carstensen JT, Rhodes CT. Drug Stability: Principle and Practices. Marcel Dekker Inc; New York. 3 rd ed. Vol. 107. 2002. p. 329-84. |
|4.||Nash RA, Wachter AH. Pharmaceutical Process Validation. 3 rd ed. Vol. 129. Marcel Dekker Inc; p. 518-22. |
|5.||ICH, Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. International Conference on Harmonization, IFPMA, Geneva: 1993. |
|6.||ICH guidelines on method validation. Available From: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/028195en.pdf [last accessed on 2008 Oct 15]. |
|7.||Green JM. A Practical guide to analytical method. Analytical Chemistry 1996. Anal Chem News Feat. 305A-309A. (May 1 1996) |
|8.|| Cahours X, Daali Y, Cherkaoui S, Veuthey JL. Simultaneous analysis of polyhydroxylated alkaloids by capillary electrophoresis using borate complexation and evaluation of sweeping technique for sensitivity improvement. Chromatographia 2006;55:211-6. |
|9.||Nirogi RV, Kandikere VN, Shukla M, Mudigonda K, Maurya S, Boosi R, et al. Liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of Miglitol in human plasma. Arzneimittel forschung 2006;56:328-36. |
|10.||Li X, Wang Y, Wang J, Fawcett JP, Zhao L, Gu J. Determination of miglitol in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2006;21:247-51. |
|11.||Ibrahim FA, Ali FA, Ahmed SM, Tolba MM. Kinetic Determination of Acarbose and Miglitol in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulations Using Alkaline Potassium Permanganate. Int J Biomed Sci 2007;3:20-30. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]